Key to Hexastylisin North Carolina
Key adapted from Blomquist (1957 [Brittonia]), Gaddy (1987 [Castanea]), Whittemore and Gaddy (1997 [FNA]), Weakley (2008), and Gaddy (2011 [Phytoneuron]). Photos by Krings, unless otherwise indicated. Line drawings from Britton & Brown (1913; An illustrated flora of the northern United States, Canada and the British Possessions). Maps courtesy of USDA PLANTS and the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program.
1. Style extension distinctly bifid to stigma; leaves triangular to ovate-sagittate or subhastate...H. arifolia
Leaf of Hexastylis arifolia (Photo: Krings)
Leaves of Hexastylis arifolia (Photo: Krings)
Flower of Hexastylis arifolia (Photo: Krings)
Flower of Hexastylis arifolia (Photo: Krings)
Flower of Hexastylis arifolia (Photo: Krings)
Flower detail of Hexastylis arifolia (Photo: Krings)
Flower detail of Hexastylis arifolia (Photo: Krings)
Hexastylis arifolia
(A-B, var. arifolia: common, mesic to dry deciduous forests, Mt, Pd, CP;
C, var. ruthii: uncommon, ultramafic outrop barrens, upland forests, Mt)
1’. Style extension notched or divided at the apex, but not bifid to the stigma; leaves cordate, subreniform,
orbicular, or triangular-cordate...2.
2. Leaf margins minutely toothed...H. rosei
Habit of Hexastylis rosei (Photo: Krings)
Leaf of Hexastylis rosei (Photo: Krings). Note minute teeth along leaf margins, as well as the impressed midvein.
Leaf of Hexastylis rosei (Photo: Krings). Note minute teeth along leaf margins, as well as the impressed midvein. In Galax urceolata (inset), the midvein is distinctly raised.
Leaf of Hexastylis rosei (Photo: Krings).
Flower of Hexastylis rosei (Photo: Krings).
Flowers of Hexastylis rosei (Photo: Krings).
Flower of Hexastylis rosei (Photo: Krings).
Hexastylis rosei
(rare; acidic cove forests; Mt)
2'. Leaf margins entire...3.
3. Inner surface of calyx lobes pilose with whitish hairs...H. lewisii
Habit of Hexastylis lewisii. Note diffuse, non-clumping, arrangement along elongate rhizome (Photo: Krings)
Habit of Hexastylis lewisii (Photo: Krings)
Leaf of Hexastylis lewisii (Photo: Krings)
Leaf of Hexastylis lewisii (Photo: Krings)
Calyx of Hexastylis lewisii with free lobes removed; showing pilose trichomes in throat (Photo: Krings)
Pilose pubescence of inner calyx of Hexastylis lewisii (Photo: Krings)
Androecium and gynoecium of Hexastylis lewisii (Photo: Krings)
Hexastylis lewisii
(rare; pocosin ecotones and upland forests; Pd, CP)
3’. Inner surface of calyx lobes puberulent...4.
4. Calyx tube broadly urceolate-campanulate or rhombic-ovate...5.
5. Calyx tube urceolate-campanulate, lobes 10–22 mm wide at base...H. shuttleworthii var. shuttleworthii
Habit of Hexastylis shuttleworthii (Photo: Krings)
Leaf of Hexastylis shuttleworthii (Photo: Krings)
Leaf of Hexastylis shuttleworthii (Photo: Krings)
Calyx tube of Hexastylis shuttleworthii (Photo: Krings)
Interior of Hexastylis shuttleworthii (Photo: Krings)
Interior calyx surface of Hexastylis shuttleworthii (Photo: Krings)
Interior of Hexastylis shuttleworthii (Photo: Krings)
Hexastylis shuttleworthii var. shuttleworthii
(uncommon; acidic deciduous forests, frequently along creeks; Mt)
5’. Calyx tube rhombic-ovate (broadest near the middle), lobes 3–8 mm wide at base...6.
6. Internal calyx tube reticulations absent or poorly developed, ridges < 1.0 mm if present; ovary ca. 1/3 inferior
...H. contracta
Leaf of Hexastylis contracta (Photo: Krings)
Hexastylis contracta (Photo: Krings)
Calyx lobes of Hexastylis contracta (Photo: Krings)
Internal throat hairs of Hexastylis contracta (calyx lobes removed; Photo: Krings)
Androecium and gynoecium of Hexastylis contracta. Note also the very low ridges on the internal tube walls (Photo: Krings)
Low internal ridges at base of tube of Hexastylis contracta (Photo: Krings)
1/3 inferior ovary of Hexastylis contracta (Photo: Krings)
Hexastylis contracta
(rare [State E, S1 G3]; acidic deciduous forests; Mt)
6’. Internal calyx tube reticulations well developed, ridges 1.5–2 mm tall; ovary superior...H. rhombiformis
Leaf of Hexastylis rhombiformis (Photo: Krings)
Calyx tube of Hexastylis rhombiformis (Photo: Krings)
Variation in calyx tube of Hexastylis rhombiformis (Photo: Krings)
Variation in calyx tube of Hexastylis rhombiformis (Photo: Krings)
Calyx lobes of Hexastylis rhombiformis (Photo: Krings)
Tall internal ridges of calyx tube of Hexastylis rhombiformis (upper portion of tube removed; Photo: Krings)
Androecium and gynoecium, as well as calyx wall, of Hexastylis rhombiformis (Photo: Krings)
Hexastylis rhombiformis
(rare [SR-L, S3 G3]; acidic deciduous forests, frequently along creeks; Mt)
4’. Calyx tube cylindrical to narrowly cylindro-urceolate...7.
7. Calyx tube cylindrical to narrowly cylindro-urceolate, lobes 2–4 mm long, erect to slightly spreading...H. virginica
Leaf of Hexastylis virginica (Photo: Krings)
Hexastylis virginica (Photo: Krings)
Hexastylis virginica (Photo: Krings)
Hexastylis virginica (Photo: Krings)
Hexastylis virginica (Photo: Krings)
Hexastylis virginica (Photo: Krings)
Hexastylis virginica (Photo: Krings)
Hexastylis virginica
(common; upland forests; Mt, Pd, CP)
7’. Calyx tube cylindrical, lobes 4–15 mm long, moderately spreading to reflexed...8.
8. Calyx tube usually wider than long, orifice wider than the lobe lengths (lobes 9-16 x 8-16 mm);
ovary ca. 1/3 inferior...9.
9. Calyx tube 12–25 mm long, leaves always densely variegated...H. minor
Hexastylis minor (Photo: Krings)
Hexastylis minor (Photo: Krings)
Hexastylis minor (Photo: Krings)
Hexastylis minor (Photo: Krings)
Hexastylis minor (Photo: Krings)
Trichomes on calyx lobe of Hexastylis minor (Photo: Krings)
Hexastylis minor (Photo: Krings)
Hexastylis minor
(common; dry to moist forests; Pd, CP)
9'. Calyx tube 8–18 mm long, leaves sparsely variegated to not variegated...Hexastylis sorriei
Habitat of Hexastylis sorriei: Seep in sandhill Pinus palustris savanna (Photo: Krings)
Leaf of Hexastylis sorriei (Photo: Krings)
Leaf of Hexastylis sorriei (Photo: Krings)
Flower of Hexastylis sorriei (Photo: Krings)
Flower of Hexastylis sorriei (Photo: Krings)
Flower of Hexastylis sorriei (Photo: Krings)
Flower of Hexastylis sorriei (Photo: Krings)
Hexastylis sorriei
(infrequent; pocosin ecotones, margins of sandhill seeps; Pd/CP)
8’. Calyx tube at least as long as wide or longer, orifice narrower than the lobe lengths; ovary superior or
half-inferior...10.
10. Calyx tube 7–14 mm wide, lobes 6–17 mm wide; ovary superior; leaves typically not variegated
...H. heterophylla
Leaf of Hexastylis heterophylla (Photo: Krings)
Hexastylis heterophylla (Photo: Krings)
Hexastylis heterophylla (Photo: Krings)
Hexastylis heterophylla (Photo: Krings)
Hexastylis heterophylla (Photo: Krings)
Hexastylis heterophylla (Photo: Krings)
Androecium and gynoecium of Hexastylis heterophylla (Photo: Krings)
Hexastylis heterophylla
(common; dry to mesic forests; Mt, Pd)
10’. Calyx tube 4–7 mm wide, lobes 4–7 mm wide; ovary half-inferior; leaves freq. variegated...H. naniflora
Habitat of Hexastylis naniflora: Moist Piedmont slope (Photo: Krings)
Habitat of Hexastylis naniflora: Moist Piedmont slope (Photo: Krings)
Leaves of Hexastylis naniflora (Photo: Krings)
Flower of Hexastylis naniflora (Photo: Krings)
Flower of Hexastylis naniflora (Photo: Krings)
Flower of Hexastylis naniflora (Photo: Krings)
Flower of Hexastylis naniflora (Photo: Krings)
Hexastylis naniflora
(rare [Fed T, S3 G]; acidic deciduous forests; Pd; late winter to spring)
**Errata in: Gaddy (
2011: A new species of
Hexastylis (Aristolochiaceae) from the Sandhills of North and South Carolina. Phytoneuron 2011-47: 1–5):
Under
Specimens Cited, the first specimen cited from Cumberland Co., NC, is actually
Hexastylis arifolia and should be deleted from the list of paratypes. Radford's collection number of the Richmond Co. specimen is
11336, not
11356.
Federally listed taxon—Hexastylis naniflora (Fed T, State T | S3 G3 |
NHP |
USFWS| Five-year review)
Habitat. "Acidic sandy loam soils along bluffs and nearby slopes, hillsides and ravines, in boggy areas adjacent to creekheads and streams. Soil type is the most important habitat requirement (Pacolet, Madison, or Musella types)" (USFWS)
Status. NHP recognizes seventy-six populations extant in North Carolina, of which forty-one are judged of good viability (as of Sep 2010). In the five-year review (2011; see above), the USFWS recognized 108 populations. This species may be a candidate for delisting in the future.
Threats. Residential/industrial development, conversion of woodlands to pasture, reservoir construction, herbicides.
|
|
Distribution (courtesy SE Flora Atlas) |
Habitat (acidic, deciduous woods) |
|
|
Floral tube; detail of androecium and gynoecium |
Leaf (note variegation) |
|
|
Leaves (note variegation) |
Leaf (note variegation) |
|
|
Leaf (note variagation) |
Flower |
|
|
Flower (lateral view) |
Flower |
|
|
Hexastylis naniflora pollen (no "bumps") [Padget
2004] |
Hexastylis heterophylla pollen (note surface bumps)
[Padget 2004] |
|
|
Hexastylis minor pollen (not surface bumps) [Padget
2004] |
|
Similar taxa:
Leaves of Asarum canadense may at first glance be taken for Hexastylis. However, note the distinct differences in flower structure in the images below. In contrast to Hexastylis, the flowers of Asarum canadense are conspicuously pubescent and the perianth lobes are not completely fused into a tube.
Asarum can be distinguished from
Hexastylis by the following key:
1. Sepals distinct (although touching valvately and forming a
well-defined false tube); anthers each with prominent terminal appendages;
styles connate in a column...Asarum
1'. Sepals connate for most of their length; anthers lacking
terminal appendages; styles distinct (except sometimes at extreme base)...Hexastylis
Illustration from Flora of North America (1997)
Leaf of Asarum canadense (Photo: Krings)
Flower of Asarum canadense (Photo: Krings)
Flower of Asarum canadense (Photo: Krings)
Flower of Asarum canadense (Photo: Krings)
Flower of Asarum canadense (Photo: Krings)
Flower of Asarum canadense (Photo: Krings)
Flower of Asarum canadense (Photo: Krings)
Kelly (1998 [Amer. J. Bot.]) has argued for submerging
Hexastylis into Asarum, based on molecular evidence. He proposed this
action as a "conservative" approach, arguing that the alternative of recognizing
two clades would require over fifty new combinations. However, Kelly did
not consider an additional alternative of recognizing more than two clades,
which would require negligible new combinations and be consistent with the
morphological/molecular distinctness he himself noted.
Fig. 4. The strict consensus tree of the 288 equally most
parsimonious trees from the simultaneous analysis of ITS and morphological data.
Taxon areas are indicated to the right. The 9-bp deletion is mapped on the tree.
Sepal morphology is mapped for species of Asarum s.s.; the characters
shown were not included in the morphological analysis because of continuous
variation. Mapping indicates that the extremes of variation have been
independently derived in North America and in Asia (Kelly 1998 [Amer. J. Bot.]).